Many governments in the world

雅思写作大作文题目

Many governments in the world spend large amounts of money on art which helps to develop quality in people’s lives.However,governments should spend money on other things rather than art.Do you agree or disagree?

世界上的许多政府在艺术上投入大量资金以帮助提升人们的生活质量。然而，政府应该将钱用在其他方面而非艺术。你在多大程度上同意或者不同意这一观点？

雅思写作大作文范文

开头段

Societies with a heritage in the‘arts’have long been considered culturally sophisticated and advanced.However,with the recent financial crisis this lavishness and expense should be questioned.Tax-payers’money has to be spent practically rather than on cultural endeavours.Firstly,not everyone in society appreciates art,and,secondly,employment should take precedence.

拥有艺术遗产的社会往往被认为在文化方面更为精致更为高级。然而，在当前金融危机的影响下，这一奢侈和花费应该受到质疑。纳税人的钱必须用在实用的地方，而非文化尝试。首先，不是社会中的每个人都欣赏艺术，其次，就业应该优先。

艺术爱好者太少

Art can bring quality into one’s life if you are interested.In society art-lovers are typically in the minority,and other activities,such as sports are more popular.Take football,for example.Across the globe it is obvious that there are more people watching matches in stadiums than looking at sculptures or art.This fact makes it impossible that art can bring quality into a community if the galleries hold little interest for the region.

如果你对艺术感兴趣的话，艺术能够增强一个人的生活品质。在社会中，艺术爱好者通常只占少数，而其他活动，比如运动，更为流行。以足球为例，很明显，世界范围内有更多人在体育场馆中观看比赛，而非欣赏雕塑或艺术。既然普通民众对艺术不感兴趣，那么艺术能够提升社区的生活品质就成了无稽之谈。

钱应该用在能使大多数人受益的地方

Secondly,the resources diverted to such projects come from the public and should be spent in a way that benefits them.Commissioning or purchasing art is an insult to taxpayers who endure high unemployment,such as,those in Newcastle,UK.This city suffers from historically high unemployment,yet the council commissioned a large sculpture called‘The Angel of the North’.Financing a job creation project would undoubtedly have been more practical for the local community.

其次，用于这些项目的资源来自于公众。它们应该是其受益。购买艺术品对忍受较高失业率的纳税人来说是种侮辱。例如，英国的纽卡斯尔正遭受前所未有的高失业率，然后当地政府却委托创作一座被称为“北部天使”的大型雕塑。将资金用于创造工作岗位无疑对当地社区更为实用。

结论

To conclude,I believe that it is an unjust affirmation that art brings quality into one’s life,and I agree that the money should be spent elsewhere.This is because art expenditures only benefit a small minority and secondly the expense involved should benefit the majority.Ideally in the future,governments will recognise that quality in a person’s life derives from a decent opportunity in life,not a sculpture.

总的来说，我认为艺术能够提高生活品质的判断是没有依据的，钱应该用于别的地方。这是因为艺术花费只能使少部分人受益，而这笔钱应该让大多数人过的更好。理想情况下，未来政府会意识到，一个人的生活品质来自于体面的生活，而非雕塑。

>> 雅思 托福 免费测试、量身规划、让英语学习不再困难<<